User talk:Stebunik/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Bogdanffy-Szilard_7.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 15:15, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Tapai_JP2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 15:16, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Joze-Poljanec_Stepinac.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 15:19, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:1943_Stepinac01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 15:23, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

In this year will pass 70 years, when Stepinac,s letter was published. So I please you, to restoring. --Stebunik (talk) 21:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
File:Pij-IX.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 15:29, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.


You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.

--Stebunik (talk) 18:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Pope-Cornelius_Callist1a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 15:38, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Drina'-1_Tapai.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 15:44, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Perko-Grozde_1992.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 15:47, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:GabrijelBukatko.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 20:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Brencic_Podlipa-dom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 20:09, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

This picture is created from my father about 1937, so I give permission. --Stebunik (talk) 12:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Please help, give you the appropriate license. I do not understand it, is too complicated.--Stebunik (talk) 12:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.


You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.

--Stebunik (talk) 18:50, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Please help, give you the appropriate license. I do not understand it, is too complicated.--Stebunik (talk) 12:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.


You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.

--Stebunik (talk) 18:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Please help, give you the appropriate license. I do not understand it, is too complicated.--Stebunik (talk) 12:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Please help, give you the appropriate license. I do not understand it, is too complicated.--Stebunik (talk) 12:27, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Let you give categories, because I can not it. Thank you very much!--Stebunik (talk) 12:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.


You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.

--Stebunik (talk) 18:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Picture File:Sixtus-III Seppelt.jpg is in public domain, because edited already in 1933 in book of
  • F. X. Seppelt –K. Löffler: Papstgeschichte von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Josef Kösel&Friedrich Pustet, München 1933, page 34. I scanned it. Maybe is photo older yet. I think, that this picture is from serie of Popes in Basilica di San Paolo fuori le mura, Roma. Let you write corresponded free license! Thank you very much! --Stebunik (talk) 23:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Public domain

This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer.


You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States. Note that a few countries have copyright terms longer than 70 years: Mexico has 100 years, Jamaica has 95 years, Colombia has 80 years, and Guatemala and Samoa have 75 years. This image may not be in the public domain in these countries, which moreover do not implement the rule of the shorter term. Honduras has a general copyright term of 75 years, but it does implement the rule of the shorter term. Copyright may extend on works created by French who died for France in World War II (more information), Russians who served in the Eastern Front of World War II (known as the Great Patriotic War in Russia) and posthumously rehabilitated victims of Soviet repressions (more information).

--Stebunik (talk) 18:52, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  magyar  português do Brasil  Nederlands  português  français  македонски  slovenščina  русский  suomi  日本語  +/−
File:Celje-Bertoni Lojze-Grozde 72.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("File:Celje-Bertoni Lojze-Grozde 72.jpg") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

Eleassar (t/p) 13:52, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Stebunik, pozdravljen. Svoje vprašanje si postavil na napačno mesto (v predlogo), zato sem ga skopiral na, upam, ustreznejše mesto: Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Celje-Bertoni Lojze-Grozde 72.jpg. Da boš vedel, kje iskati odziv wikimedijine ekipe. MZaplotnik my contributions 22:28, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
Hvala ti. Jaz se na te reci kratkomalo ne razumem. Dobil sem od njih nekaksen odgovor, pa so mi postale stvari le se bolj zapletene.--Stebunik (talk) 19:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Nekdo od vaju z bratom naj pošlje e-mail na permissions-commons@wikimedia.org z izjavo o avtorstvu in strinjanju z objavo pod prosto licenco. Tule in tule (čisto na dnu strani, pod 'DECLARATION OF CONSENT') so vzorci dopisov, vstaviti moraš le ustrezne podatke. Poslani e-mail je zelo pomemben, ker bo ekipi na Zbirki služil kot dokazilo o avtorstvu fotografije. Srečno, MZaplotnik my contributions 07:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Stebunik. You have new messages at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Celje-Bertoni Lojze-Grozde 72.jpg.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

I did not find notice about File:Celje-Bertoni Lojze-Grozde 72.jpg Let you explain. Thank you!--Stebunik (talk) 19:53, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 22:59, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
File:St-Rupert-martyrs Mavsar-chapel 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 10:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

I am author of File File:St-Rupert-martyrs Mavsar-chapel 06.jpg. I agree with deletion, because this file has inscription. I uploaded the same file withouth inscription. --Stebunik (talk) 08:46, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I am sorry but per Commons:Deletion requests/File:St-Rupert-martyrs Mavsar-chapel 06.jpg, the file is not free because it depicts a copyrighted sculpture. I've tagged it for speedy deletion. It may be undeleted after a consensus for this is gained at COM:UDR. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Celje center 2006.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Celje center 2006.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eleassar (t/p) 00:47, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Public domain I, the copyright holder of this work, release this work into the public domain. This applies worldwide.
In some countries this may not be legally possible; if so:
I grant anyone the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

--Stebunik (talk) 18:14, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Could you please explain ...

Could you please explain why you erased the thread I introduced to Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests? You erased it less than four hours after the sole comment to it. It hadn't been closed, and had only been open less than a day. Geo Swan (talk) 05:27, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

If it was erased, it was by mistake, I would it not. I sent only explainig, which files I will, that they remain and which files I made by mine.--Stebunik (talk) 08:08, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
I restored it. Geo Swan (talk) 19:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
No one seems to have understood your last note
you put my answer
Some of these works are my own works.
OK. So please list the photos you personally took.
There, where I made great inscriptions on photos, I wish not to undelete.
If you mean you put your own notes on copies of photos taken by someone else then the underlying copyright of the original photographer would take precedence. You need their permission to use their underlying image.
These photos I will upload once more.
If the underlying image is copyright you should get the permission of the copyright holder first
The others are photos of mine (withouth inscription) and I wish to restore them. I write: my picture, restore it! From Strle I wish it to restoring for honest use (info-box for article).
As above, you need to list the images you took yourself. These should be restore-able, provided you licensed them under a free license.
I have permission from Redaction of Družina, it is from their archive. Some pictures are scanned from newspaper from 1904: (scanned)
Individuals who have given you their permission have to use our One Ticket System, COM:OTRS, to confidentially inform us they gave their permission.
Please ask them to send their permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org
The church-school in Crna bara is my photo from older photo.
If the older photo is so old it is no longer under copyright you can upload a photo of it. If it is merely old, but still covered by the original photographer`s copyright, you can`t use it here, without their permission.
It can be used as native house of Bogdánffy Szilárd by his biography. I can not, what a license.
Sorry, I don`t understand this.
JMB writing is photo of my brother. My brother gives me permission for use as free license, so the picture of Bertone too.
As above, you would need your brother to write to OTRS with their permission.
Please ask them to send their permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

Good luck Geo Swan (talk) 19:56, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

I will answer, when I have time. It is complex thing.--Stebunik (talk) 20:38, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

"honest use" or "fair use" ...

I took a look at a few of your recent uploads. The street images you took yourself of the clerics are fine. Congratulations!

File:Pogacnik-Joze Jakac.jpg claims "honest use". In English we have a concept "fair use". The commons doesn't ever allow uploading of "fair use" images. The English language wikipedia, and many other language specific wikis have rules that allow for limited use of fair use images.

If your fair use image complies with the rules for honest use on the sl.wikipedia.org, you should upload it there -- and then request its deletion here. Geo Swan (talk) 16:33, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Same applies to File:Stanko-Cajnkar.jpg

If you have the right permission to use File:Strle-Anton.jpg then you should ask them send it to the OTRS email address above. Alternatively, you could upload the image to sl.wikipedia.org. Geo Swan (talk) 21:32, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

When can we use "honest use" and when as "fair use"? I will to use Strle, Cajnkar, Pogačnik in other Wikipedias too, but only in articles, that speak about them. If I understood, it may be done. Or?
By files MJB-by-writing.jpg , Strle-Anton.jpg and JP II.jpg, is the thing otherwise: there I received permission for use pictures as in "public domain" from authors.--Stebunik (talk) 21:47, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
It is one of the rules of the http://commons.wikimedia.org (this site) that it will never host fair use images -- under any circumstances.
Other projects, like http://en.wikipedia.org and http://sl.wikipedia.org can set different rules about fair use. Here are the rules for fair use at the English language wikipedia -- non-free content criteria. There are probably similar rules at http://sl.wikipedia.org.
Images that are considered "free" -- like the very fine images of those young people you took yourself -- can be uploaded to the commons, and then used on any site. Or they get to remain, for potential use.
Images that aren't free would have to be individually uploaded to each separate wiki where they are used.
On the english language wikipedia, fair use images get deleted one week after they are removed from the (last) article where they are used. The uploader has to explain why the image can't be replaced by a free image. And there are some quality control volunteers who are quite aggressive about challenging whether fairuse image meet the non-free content criteria. They will, for instance, even argue that images of prisoners who face life imprisonment were "replaceable" with a free image.
With regard to File:MJB-by-writing.jpg, File:Strle-Anton.jpg and File:JP II.jpg -- you will find that, eventually, you will have to ask your contacts to confirm the permission to the OTRS email address I offered above.
Good luck Geo Swan (talk) 01:36, 13 February 2013 (UTC)