User talk:Tangopaso

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Tangopaso!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 06:14, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sculpture de Henri Lombard

Bonjour, Il me semble qu'il y a une erreur dans l'attribution de la sculpture du fronton du Crédit Lyonnais File:Siège CL écusson.jpg que vous attribuez à Henri Lombard ; cette sculpture serait de Camille Lefèvre. Les quatre cariatides situées en dessous du fronton et de part et d'autre de l'horloge sont de Henri Lombard, édouard Pépin, Antoine Carlés et Désiré Maurice Ferrary. Il y aurait donc confusion entre le réalisateur de la sculpture d'une des cariatides et celui du fronton. Qu'en pensez-vous ? Robert Valette (talk) 17:59, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bonjour

Merci de vos renseignements, je signale l'erreur à l'auteur de la catégorisation (Guimis) qui est le rédacteur de l'article en espagnol sur le sculpteur Henri Lombard, je suis celui de l'article en français. Je tire mes renseignements de différents articles mais surtout d'un site internet de la ville de Paris, ce qui ma parait une bonne source. Quant à vos déboires sur les droits d'auteur, cela ne me surprend pas car la réglementation est totalement surréaliste, on rencontre le même problème avec des photos de l'immeuble du Corbusier à Marseille qui sont sytématiquement supprimées. J'ai entendu dire que quelqu'un qui avait acheté les droits pour prendre en photo l'arche de la Défense a été quand même condamné car sa photo a été prise de nuit et qu'il n'avait pas respecté les droits de celui qui avait mis en place le système d'éclairage ! Les réalisateurs de cartes postales sont régulièrement confrontés à ce problème. CordialementRobert Valette (talk) 12:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paname (suite)

Bonjour. Moi aussi, je m'y suis mis, mais seulement pour des détails tels que les plaques de rues, pour commencer. Quant à la nomenclature des rues, je suis désormais le conseil de Jastrow (sauf quand j'oublie), à savoir le fait de mettre Paris entre parenthèses après le nom de la rue (ou de la place, du square, etc.). Au départ, je n'imaginais pas que ce projet prendrait une telle ampleur, mais je crois maintenant que ce sera utile pour le long terme. Je te signale aussi que j'ai commencé à affiner la Category:Street furniture in Paris avec des rubriques spécifiques pour Paris, par exemple Category:Guard stones in Paris. Au final, si j'ose employer ce mot, tout ça devrait constituer une base documentaire plutôt sympa. Mais je n'envisage pas encore de créer une catégorie pour chaque numéro de chaque rue... Encore merci pour ton soutien et tes encouragements. - Mu (talk) 19:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Selon fr:Liste des voies de Paris, c'est la Rue des Degrés qui serait la voie la plus courte de Paris, ce qu'une rapide recherche sur Google semble confirmer. Mais j'avoue ne pas avoir moi-même mesuré... - Mu (talk) 19:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vol d'image

Bonjour Tango,
Désolé pour ce larcin ! Plus sérieusement, si tu penses pouvoir faire (ou avoir fait) une meilleure photo d'un de « mes » sujets, n'hésite pas à écraser la mienne. Pour ma part, parmi les dernières plaques que j'ai pu repérer, j'ai été particulièrement content d'être tombé sur celle-ci : File:Plaque Chapelle Saint-Michel-du-Palais, Paris 1.jpg, qui recèle, sous toute la crasse dont elle est recouverte, tout un pan de l'histoire de France, et qui semble elle-même être assez ancienne.
Par ailleurs, depuis un certain temps déjà, je voulais te signaler un beau sujet sur lequel tu ferais certainement un meilleur travail que moi, si jamais cela t'intéressait. Il s'agit de la faïencerie Pichenot, au 4 rue de la Pierre-Levée, dans le 11^e, non loin de la place de la République. Outre le bâtiment lui-même, il y a plusieurs fresques qui feraient une jolie série à elles seules. Techniquement, ce n'est pas du gâteau, car la rue est très étroite, et il faut tomber sur le temps idéal, ni trop d'ombre ni trop de soleil.
Rive droite ou rive gauche ? Maintenant que tu me le fais remarquer, je m'aperçois en effet que j'ai surtout sévi rive gauche ces derniers temps, en particulier pour ce qui concerne les plaques commémoratives du 6^e et du 7^e. Mais ça pourrait tout aussi bien changer du jour au lendemain.
Amitiés, Mu (talk) 19:43, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pour la codification des dates, je note, merci. Pour la géolocalisation, d'accord, mais comment diable fait-on ? (J'imagine que ça doit être expliqué quelque part, mais je n'ai pas encore cherché où.) A mon tour, une recommandation : pense à mettre « (Paris) » après le nom de la rue ou de la place quand tu crées une nouvelle catégorie. Je suis en train de rediriger, petit à petit, toutes celles où cette indication manque, pour homogénéiser le tout.

J'aime assez cette image : reconstruire Paris. Je pense par contre que ce que l'on fait, ce n'est encore qu'un embryon. Notre-Dame et la tour Eiffel n'ont certes plus besoin de nous, ni non plus les stations de métro, mais quand je vois le nombre d'aspects de la ville qui jusqu'ici n'ont été qu'effleurés, sinon totalement négligés, je me dis qu'il faudra bien 20 ans pour alimenter vraiment le sujet. C'est en tout cas quelque chose qui me frappe en parcourant dans Wikipédia les articles sur Paris, qui commencent un tant soit peu à prendre leur essor mais sont encore chichement illustrés. Pour ma part, je viens de regarder, j'ai téléchargé sur Commons environ 3600 images, mais ce sont presque toutes des images dans le domaine public, puisées pour une large part dans les collections de la Library of Congress et de la BnF. Ce n'est que tout récemment, profitant d'une période où je dispose d'un peu plus de temps qu'à l'ordinaire, que j'ai pris l'habitude d'empocher mon appareil quand je sors de chez moi.

Enfin, pour Montmartre, ce n'est pas un pensum que j'ai voulu t'infliger ; de plus, toutes ces rues en escalier se ressemblent, et on peut toujours espérer qu'un habitant du quartier passe un jour sur Commons pour catégoriser ça en un tournemain.

- Mu (talk) 22:18, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Géolocalisation, etc.

Bien merci pour ces explications. Ce que j'en retiens pour l'instant, c'est qu'il faut avoir une boussole dans la tête à défaut d'en avoir une dans la poche. Mais je vais tâcher de potasser ça un peu plus sérieusement.
J'avais remarqué ta juxtaposition ingénieuse de photos anciennes et modernes. Quant à la Library of Congress (LOC), il n'y a pratiquement pas d'images de Paris ; je pense d'ailleurs avoir à peu près tout épluché de ce côté-là. Pour ma part, j'y ai puisé essentiellement des photos de personnalités. Mais alors qu'il y a dans le lot un certain nombre de personnalités françaises, comme par exemple File:Louis Barthou 01.jpg ou File:Charles Fabry.jpg, c'est surtout l'aspect international du projet qui m'a attiré. Car il y a dans la collection de la LOC des photos qu'on ne trouve nulle part ailleurs et qui intéressent par conséquent de nombreux wikis, comme File:Abraham Isaac Kook 1924.jpg ou File:Jan Masaryk.jpg, File:Maria Montessori.jpg ou File:Jiddu Krishnamurti 01.jpg. Evidemment, leur qualité est très variable. Mais un autre avantage de la LOC, c'est la possibilité de télécharger nombre d'images en très haute résolution (format .tiff, que l'on convertit après coup en .jpeg), ce qui est toujours intéressant, même dans le cas d'un sujet plutôt spécialisé tel que File:Improved Order of Red Men certificate 1889.jpg. Pas question par contre de faire ça en masse. Chercher, downloader, recadrer et ajuster au besoin, catégoriser et documenter, uploader - tout ça prend du temps. Et je ne parle pas de ceux qui restaurent les photos anciennes pour en faire des images de qualité, ce qui dépasse pour l'instant mes capacités techniques. Bref, il y a là de quoi occuper plusieurs vies !
Outre la BnF, j'imagine que tu recherches aussi sur Google Images, où l'on a parfois d'heureuses surprises. Les images qui sont de toute évidence pd-old sont acceptées sur Commons, même si le site d'origine prétend en détenir le copyright. Mais il ne faut pas hésiter non plus à explorer dans Gallica les livres et les magazines sur le sujet auquel on s'intéresse, car il y en a parfois qui contiennent des illustrations utilisables, non répertoriées parmi les images. (Dans ce cas, il est plus rapide de rechercher par lots de vignettes que page à page.) Ainsi, j'avais beaucoup puisé à une époque dans les magazines artistiques des années 1860-1920 (œuvres et portraits) et dans des publications telles que les Albums Mariani et le Trombinoscope de Touchatout. Mais là aussi, il faut y passer du temps... Mu (talk) 20:09, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Toujours à propos de géolocalisation, je viens de m'apercevoir que Coyau mettait (parfois) cette indication dans la catégorie de la rue ou de la place, comme par exemple pour Category:Place de la République (Paris), ce qui me semble assez logique. Mais étant néophyte dans ce domaine, je n'ai pas vraiment d'avis pertinent à offrir, et j'ignore si le sujet a déjà été débattu.
Autre chose. Moi aussi, je vais déposer plainte pour vol de plaque commémorative. Il s'agit en l'occurrence de celle-ci, dont je me suis aperçu seulement après l'avoir photographiée que tu l'avais déjà faite. Pas de regrets cependant : la tienne était meilleure que la mienne. -:) - Mu (talk) 20:19, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paname encore et toujours

Pour les passages, côté esthétique, je t'avais prévenu, mais si tu en as quelques-unes de bien, j'espère que la déception n'a pas été trop grande. Concernant les mises à jour, je te signale pour info la création de Category:Plaques commemorating the French Resistance. Je ne sais pas trop si une sous-catégorie pour Paris serait utile. Par ailleurs, je viens par hasard de m'apercevoir qu'un individu est en train de mettre sur son site certaines de nos photographies de plaques commémoratives en y ajoutant un copyright à son nom. Voir un exemple ici pour deux des tiennes et une des miennes. Qu'il s'en serve, c'est très bien, mais pas en se les appropriant frauduleusement. Sais-tu qui il faudrait contacter, par exemple chez Wikimedia France, pour qu'ils lui envoient un avertissement ? Ce genre de démarche, ce n'est pas trop mon truc. Sinon, tout va bien :-) Mu (talk) 11:07, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tu m'as bien fait rire avec la plaque Cino del Duca. 35 ans ! Du coup, je te dédie celle-ci. (Il y en a d'autres dans le même genre, que je téléchargerai plus tard.) Pour les copyright, je me suis mal exprimé. Je ne te demandais pas de prendre la chose en charge, mais simplement si tu connaissais quelqu'un qui a l'habitude de ce genre de démarche. Évidemment, ça n'a pas une énorme importance. Bravo pour les cours de la rue du Faubourg-Saint-Antoine, notamment pour la cour de l'Étoile-d'Or, qui était fermée lors de mon passage. Il y en a d'ailleurs encore d'autres dans le même coin, si jamais ça t'inspire. J'avais pensé aussi créer un jour une catégorie Courtyards in Paris, car il y en a beaucoup qui mériteraient une photo, mais je ne me suis pas encore lancé. Certaines rues en sont abondamment pourvues, avec des allures qui varient selon les quartiers, voire les micro-quartiers, tour à tour tintamarresques ou délabrées, rustiques ou surannées. Bref, il y a encore du pain sur la planche... - Mu (talk) 11:42, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Le problème avec Category:Courtyards in Paris, c'est que le terme anglais désigne les cours intérieures (au féminin) et non les voies désignées en français par le mot cour (au masculin), même s'il arrive qu'il y ait parfois en français une certaine ambiguité quant à la distinction entre les deux termes, par exemple pour la Cour de l'Étoile-d'Or. Il faudrait donc ama vider la catégorie de son contenu actuel pour y mettre par exemple les photos que tu as prises du 71 rue du Faubourg-Saint-Antoine et sans doute aussi quelques autres qui sont dispersées çà et là et qui ne sont pas déjà catégorisées parmi les Streets in Paris. Dans mon laïus de l'autre jour, ce sont d'ailleurs les cours intérieures dont je voulais parler et dont je disais qu'on manquait pour l'instant de photos. Pour Category:Destructions during the french revolutions, je pense qu'un petit chapeau explicatif ne serait pas de trop. Mais il faut impérativement des majuscules à French et à Revolutions. En anglais, les adjectifs French, Japanese, American, etc. commencent toujours par une majuscule et les minuscules choquent tout autant que si l'on écrivait en français : « Il a visité l'allemagne, l'amérique du sud, etc. » Enfin, pour les cas comme la rue de la Femme-Sans-Teste, n'hésite pas, comme je te l'ai déjà dit, à écraser mes photos si tu penses en avoir fait de meilleures : je te fais toute confiance. Et bonne chance pour le CAC 40 ! - Mu (talk) 09:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 919a2ce37c6f0dc88df6f894a3c87373

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:MQ-1C Warrior.jpg

File:MQ-1C Warrior.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

JDavid (talk) 10:07, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:A8_highway_from_Gorbio.jpg

File:A8_highway_from_Gorbio.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 00:16, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PB12_and_others.jpg

File:PB12_and_others.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 20:01, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Pour ta contribution à la préservation de l'architecture et de l'art alsaciens ! Edelseider (talk) 15:39, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vin bleu.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Vin bleu.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:23, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On the display of highlighted (FP/QI/VI) media in Commons main category structure

Hi Tangopaso,

Your name was mentioned (favorably ) in Commons:Village pump#Highlighted content in main category structure. Maybe you have some words of wisdom or ideas to add to that discussion? Best wishes from Denmark, --Slaunger (talk) 09:57, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paname-sur-Seine

Salut et fraternité ! Pour cause d'occupations diverses et variées IRL, cela faisait un moment que je n'avais pas remis les pieds ici. Dernièrement j'ai donc fait un petit tour pour voir comment se portait Paris et pour voir par la même occasion si tu étais toujours fidèle au poste. En tombant sur le boulevard Saint-Martin, j'ai bien failli te mettre un smiley, mais je me suis dit que d'autres observateurs pourraient ne pas apprécier ce genre de commentaire de diff... J'espère avoir le temps de contribuer cette année de nouvelles photos, mais quoi qu'il arrive, je suis rassuré par le fait que tu continues imperturbablement. Bien à toi, Mu (talk) 07:42, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beaver dam in EuroDisney.jpg

File:Beaver dam in EuroDisney.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.139.62 13:23, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cabanon Le Corbusier.jpg

File:Cabanon Le Corbusier.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Miniwark (talk) 18:46, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

how can something with an exact geolocation be an unidentified location

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Mi%C3%B0jar%C3%B0arhaf_001.jpg&curid=11637244&diff=90249376&oldid=83396884

--birdy geimfyglið _(:> )=| 22:16, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Views from train windows

Hello

Juste un petit mot sur tes récentes modifications de catégorie, je voulais préciser qu'en l'état, d'après l'arborescence des catégories, il n'y a pas d'incompatibilité entre la catégorie Category:Views from train windows et les catégories Views from trains in... vu que la première indique lorsqu'une photo a été prise depuis une fenêtre de train, tandis que les secondes indiquent lorsqu'une photo a été prise depuis un train (uniformément depuis une fenêtre, une porte latérale, ouverte ou non, une cabine conducteur, ou même soyons fous depuis le toit d'un train^^) avec précision du pays. Category:Views from train windows arrive en cul-de-sac et n'a pas de sous-catégorie par pays, donc je pense qu'on pourrait la faire cohabiter avec les catégories par pays, ou alors modifier l'arborescence et créer des Category:Views from train windows in suivi du nom du pays (par exemple). Voilà tu me dis ce que tu en penses si tu le souhaites Merci! Jeriby (talk) 17:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Je suis d'accord avec tes remarques. Ceci étant, la plupart des photos de Category:Views from trains ont été prises depuis une fenêtre. Et la categorie Category:Views from train windows commence à être encombrée. C'est pour cela que j'ai déplacé des photos de Category:Views from train windows vers Category:Views from trains in.... La catégorisation par pays me semblait plus importante que celle from train windows. Il me semble que le mieux serait de créer des Category:Views from train windows in... comme tu le proposes. Mais dans la plupart des cas, Category:Views from trains in XXX ne contiendra que Category:Views from train windows in XXX. Mais peut être que cela se remplira à l'avenir... Bonne continuation. --Tangopaso (talk) 06:29, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup pour ta réponse. J'ai créé la catégorie Category:Views from train windows in France avec description afin de faire la différence entre les différentes catégories possibles. Je ne l'ai fait pour l'instant que pour la France, c'est un petit essai, ce n'est pas encore parfait car il y a peut-être justement à classer tout ce qui est "hors fenêtre" (il y a peut-être des vues prises hors du train bras tendu en France, ce qui remplira Category:Views from trains in France mais tout en laissant les images en question dans Category:Views from outside of trains). Mais en l'état ça a l'avantage de ne pas laisser Category:Views from train windows en cul-de-sac. Voilà merci encore

. Jeriby (talk) 19:11, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Senecio erucifolius vs. Jacobaea erucifolia

Hi Tangopaso,

According to the The Global Compositae Checklist [1] Senecio erucifolius [2] and Jacobaea erucifolia [3] are two different plant species, with two different homeranges S. erucifolius [4] and J. erucifolia [5]. Could you tell me your opinion about this, please? Regards. DenesFeri (talk) 09:09, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I apologize, but I am not a botanic specialist and I dont have any advice about your question. I am interested by succulent plants and cactuses, but I am disappointed when seeing the changes of names. For example, the nice name Lobivia (anagram of the name of country Bolivia) changed to Echinopsis. Or Notocactus changed to Parodia. It is hard to understand and it makes genuses with (too) many species. Best regards. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:42, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, than. No problem. Thanks. DenesFeri (talk) 08:34, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flower bed of the hotel New-York at Disneyland resort Paris.jpg

File:Flower bed of the hotel New-York at Disneyland resort Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

84.61.167.120 09:37, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please undo your edits

Removing Category:Unidentified objects from images, like [6]. This category should not be removed until objects in the photo have been identified. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 06:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suppression de la catégorie Interior of Notre-Dame de Paris

Bonjour,

Je ne comprend pas pourquoi vous avez supprimé la catégorie "Interior of Notre-Dame de Paris" de certaines de mes photos comme ici : [7] alors qu'il s'agit bien de l'intérieur de la cathédrale. Pourriez-vous préciser votre raisonnement ? Merci d'avance.

Lionel Allorge (talk) 17:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Galleries in category space

Sorry but galleries in category space is against the conventions here, its okay to create gallery pages for navigation though and this is what I'm doing to Category:Categories with a gallery for a better choice of sub-categories which will be suppressed when finished.--KTo288 (talk) 15:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Badly thought out categories

Hi Tangopaso - your new subcategories in Sequoia sempervirens and Sequoiadendron giganteum are very badly thought out, as they have resulted in the mixing up and loss of information between natural and cultivated material, which is very unhelpful. Please avoid this sort of loss of very important sorting data. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 09:41, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trompe l'oeil in Sospel.jpg

File:Trompe l'oeil in Sospel.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Aga (d) 07:38, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Exposition gare de l'est de paris

Hello, you take pictures of this exhibition with moderns photos, have your some rights to make in Public Domaine?

Bonjour, Tangopaso, l'exposition de la gare de l'est est faite avec des photos modernes et des auteurs pas encore morts merci pour eux. A tu demandé leur permission pour les éditer ? Tu n'en fait pas mention dans ton versement. Tu peut contacter didier.pazery@dbmail.com pour l'obtenir ?

Cordialement Garitan (talk) 13:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

C'est vrai. J'avais bien pensé que les objets ou sculptures photographiées étaient anciens. Mais je n'avais pas pensé aux droits sur les photos. J'ai envoyé un mail pour demander l'autorisation à l'adresse indiquée le 28/10. --Tangopaso (talk) 20:31, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Collégiale Notre-Dame de Montréal (Yonne)-Saint Eutrope de Saintes-20110420.jpg

Bonjour TangoPasso
Tu as déplacé le vénérable et néanmoins énigmatique Eutrope de Saintes, vers une catégorie fourre-tout ou il rejoint l’innombrable cohorte des saints locaux. Mais cette statue est classées Monument Historique, il serait bon qu’il restât en premier lieu un lien vers l’édifice religieux de conservation, au moins à titre d’inventaire. C’est pourquoi je me suis permis de rétablir l’ancienne catégorie …
J’espère qu’Eutrope de saintes m’en sera reconnaissant !
--Daniel Villafruela (talk) 07:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Daniel,

A l'heure actuelle, la photo de statue est rattachée aux category :

Category:Saint Eutrope de Saintes, Collégiale Notre-Dame de Montréal (Yonne), rattachée elle-même à la collégiale
Category:Eutrope de Saintes
Category:Statues of Christian saints in France

Il me semble que le mieux serait de rattacher la photo seulement à la 1ere category.

De rattacher cette category à une nouvelle category Category:Statues of Saint Eutrope in France (ou Category:Statues of Saint Eutropus in France ?)

Et de rattacher cette nouvelle category à

Qu'en penses-tu ? Si tu veux, je peux m'en charger.

Bonnes contributions. --Tangopaso (talk) 16:54, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

D'accord, je souhaitais juste que l'on un lien direct Eglise <-> Mobilier. Remerciements pour ton travail. - --Daniel Villafruela (talk) 17:22, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Model of parisian buildings.jpg

File:Model of parisian buildings.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Traces of fossil shells in Vaires-sur-Marne

Hi, Tangopaso, there is an error in the paleontological use of term "fossil traces" in the categorization of this category. The fossil traces refers to marks left by the activity of living organisms on a substrate, such as footprints or tracks, not the marks left by its rests or fossils. Traces of fossils from Vaires-sur-Marne are molds of shells, not signs of the activity of those molluscs when they were alive. I remove the Category:Trace fossils in France from this category because it don't offers the expected content. Cheers --PePeEfe (talk) 19:53, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Categories_with_a_gallery_for_a_better_choice_of_sub-categories

Categories with a gallery for a better choice of sub-categories has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Alan Liefting (talk) 03:24, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Images du Louvre

Salut Tangopaso! J'ai chargé des photos comme "Le doigt sur la pyramide" parce que c'est une acte que les touristes faisaient souvent. Donc, elles ont un peu d'intérêt encyclopédique. Mais je suis d'accord avec toi qu'elles représentent une personne identifiable. Je ne les chargerai pas dans la future. Est-ce que tu connais bien l'architecture? La Category:Interior of Notre-Dame de Paris est trop difficile pour moi. Tu peux aider les catégoriser?--Paris 16 (talk) 10:04, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Paris 16: Bonjour Paris 16. J'ai découvert il y a peu cet outil notif qui permet d'envoyer une alerte à partir d'un article quelconque. Je connais les images de l'intérieur de la cathédrale. C'est justement ce que je disais, qu'il y a trop d'images proches. Je regarderai quand même pour proposer des suppressions ou catégoriser. Je suis allé voir l'expo Viollet-le-Duc. Intéressant sans plus. J'ai fait des photos que je chargerai. A bientot. --Tangopaso (talk) 10:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tu as vu Museums in Paris? J'espere que tu peux aider pour tous les liens rouge vont disparaître!--Paris 16 (talk) 15:19, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Paris 16: Qu'est-ce que tu entends par "liens rouges qui vont disparaitre" ? Je pourrais aider pour certains (du genre faire une photo de la facade). Mais je me sens pas motivé pour d'autres. Je préfère encore faire du ménage à Notre-Dame... On pourrait aussi ajouter un message aux admins de pas supprimer les liens rouges. Du genre des messageq qu'il y a dans les category Unidentified.xxxx "do not delete cat even if empty". --Tangopaso (talk) 17:50, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Avenue-de-France.jpg

File:Avenue-de-France.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed Commons:De minimis. Unfortunately so much of that building appears in the picture that I don't think the regular de minimis explanation without cropping will work. Consider the example image on Commons:De minimis. I did notice Commons:De_minimis#France_-_Freedom_of_Panorama_.22de_minimis.22_exception so I wonder if this can be considered. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:07, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I read the French deminimis - the difference is that the Louvre pyramid is central to the plaza overall so it can't simply be cropped out WhisperToMe (talk) 06:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the cropped version, but I also suggested the DR should run its course. If somehow the big building does meet de minimis then both the cropped and uncropped can be kept. If not, the cropped can be kept WhisperToMe (talk) 06:45, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Submarine and seaplane preparing the Lookout air raids.jpg

File:Submarine and seaplane preparing the Lookout air raids.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Yaush (talk) 00:42, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo de Chelles

Bonjour,

Commme je "travaille" en ce moment sur Chelles, pourrais-tu modifier la légende concernant l'église de Chelles, rue Louis Eterlet, en : Les églises jumelles Saint-Gorges et Sainte-Croix (qui de plus servent actuellement de Centre d’art contemporain de la Ville de Chelles).

J'ai ajouté 2 scans de Cp dans Category:Postcards of Seine-et-Marne

Bonne continuation - --Wayne77 (talk) 12:35, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wayne77: Bonjour

A dire vrai je vais rarement au centre de Chelles que je ne connais pas bien. Serais-tu d'accord pour faire toi-même la modif, tu as toute ma confiance. Faudrait peut être aussi créer une nlle category et mettre la category actuelle Category:Church of Abbaye de Chelles en category redirect (il n'y a pas de rename pour les category). Si ca te dit pas grand chose, je peux le faire.

Bonnex contributions. --Tangopaso (talk) 15:30, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tangopaso: pas de problème, je fais ça dès que possible. --Wayne77 (talk) 16:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Caryatids in Paris

Bonjour,

Vous avez supprimer la catégorie Caryatids in Paris de plusieurs de mes photos dont celle-ci [8]. J'aimerai comprendre pourquoi car il y a bien une Cariatide sur la droite de ce bâtiment (voir l'article Cariatide sur Wikipédia) ?

Lionel Allorge (talk) 11:19, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Lionel Allorge: : je me suis permis de remonter la category Caryatids in Paris au niveau de la category qui rassemble toutes les images de l'immeuble : Category:126 rue de Rivoli, Paris. Car elles me semblent significatives de la totalité de l'immeuble. Si vous pensez que j'ai eu tort, vous pouvez reverter.

Je profite de ce message pour regretter l'usage qui est fait (par vous et de très nombreuses autres personnes) du programme de chargement Commonist. Pour deux raisons :

Le chargement étant facile, les contributeurs ne font pas le tri dans les images qu'ils chargent. Dans votre cas, était il bien utile de charger les images 12 et 13 qui sont très proches.
Le fait que toutes les images chargées en un lot ont la même description. Dans votre cas, pas de problème. Mais si on arrivait à trouver des infos (sculpteur, signification...) des caryatides, cela aurait été dommage de ne pas les faire figurer dans les photos concernées.

Bonnes contributions. --Tangopaso (talk) 13:22, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, sur la catégorie Caryatids in Paris, je ne comprend pas pourquoi avoir déplacé cette catégorie au niveau de l'immeuble et ne pas l'avoir fait aussi pour la catégorie des Atlantes in Paris, cela semble illogique de différencier ces deux catégories. Concernant Commonist, je ne partage pas votre point de vue :-) C'est au contraire un outil très utile pour participer à Commons et je le recommande chaque fois que je le peux. A propos des deux photos dont vous parlez, elles ont le même sujet en effet mais ne sont pas cadrées de la même manière. Il est utile d'avoir différents cadrages possibles pour un futur utilisateur qui aura ainsi plus de choix. Librement. Lionel Allorge (talk) 10:47, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Lionel Allorge: : Bonjour. Je ne souhaite pas polémiquer et j'ai reverté mes modifs.

Il n'empêche que la category Caryatids in Paris contient plusieurs photos de caryatides pour un même immeuble. Il me semblait intéressant de les grouper et d'affecter la category à l'immeuble. Bien sûr il aurait fallu le faire aussi pour les atlantes, mais je ne m'étais pas venu sur cette categorie.

Je suis en désaccord total sur commonist. Les deux photos dont je parlais sont trop proches l'une de l'autre. Il n'y a pas de plus value encyclopédique à avoir les deux photos. On n'est plus dans un concept d'encyclopédie, mais dans celui de collections comme Flickr. On arrive dans certaines catégories de Paris à des pléthores d'images trop semblables. Par exemple dans les sous-catégories de la tour Eiffel. Et Commonist conduit à la facilité d'une même description pour toutes les photos, ce qui est dommage (pas dans votre cas, d'accord). A mon sens, une encyclopédie ne doit pas être une bassine où on vide toutes les photos que l'on a pu faire dans les rues de Paris. Sans se préoccuper de ce qu'il y a déjà. Et dans dix ans, avec ces ajouts de trop nombreuses photos, comment navigera-t-on dans les catégories de Paris ??? Bonnes contributions. --Tangopaso (talk) 16:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category-based galleries

Bonjour! I think about how Chinese, Japanese, and Korean users may find difficulty in using the Commons. Why not introduce category-based galleries in topics related to China, Taiwan, Japan, and Korea? Perhaps users from those places will really appreciate them! WhisperToMe (talk) 18:57, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: Hello. I agree to facilitate access for non-english wikipedians, but I dont understand what you mean by that. I dont know a lot about these countries, except bonsai, I have a dozen at home.

PS : in the photos of Paris, I canceled photos in Montigny-le-Bretonneux. For me, it is too far from Paris. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:46, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can add some text in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean to any galleries you make. That way they can become accessible to people from East Asia.

It's fine if Montigny-le-Bretonneux is too far for you. If you know any Wikipedians who are willing to go there to take some photos please let me know :)

WhisperToMe (talk) 21:56, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want me to suggest having the category galleries on the Commons village pump? I can mention it in the English, Chinese, Japanese, and Korean village pumps WhisperToMe (talk) 09:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: I am not very favourable. Because there are always wikipedians or admins with a very stright thinking. They already said that categories are made to gather files of images. But must not be used in files. I fear that if you discuss about that, they dont agree and order to delete these categories with a gallery.

Another solution should be to add these category with a gallery for... inside an english, chinese and japanese article. Such as Central Park (or something in Houston) for english, Forbidden City for chinese and Tokyo imperial Palace for japanese. People will see these galleries and perhaps will use them in their own pages. Perhaps, I can do one for Golde gate bridge.

Do the best (as usual) and as you want. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:49, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean a "gallery" page? There are possibilities of having a "see also" linking to particular popular categories. But I also want to have a general navigation system that can use any page. Normally I would be fine with "we can't use a category page as a gallery" but I've learned that there is no possibility of allowing "category names" to be displayed in Asian languages anytime soon. I think it's important for the Commons to come up with a system of allowing navigation. In the meantime I started a discussion on alternate ways of linking to Commons:Village_pump#Ideas_on_how_to_allow_for_navigation_of_categories_for_non-English_speakers.3F_.28particularly_non-Latin_language_users.29 WhisperToMe (talk) 09:04, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@WhisperToMe: OK. For me it is a little bit hard to understand, because I do not see the problems of no-Latin languages users (but I agree that there are).--Tangopaso (talk) 11:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seine river from the viaduc d'Austerlitz.jpg

File:Seine river from the viaduc d'Austerlitz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:59, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lake of Disney Village 2.jpg

File:Lake of Disney Village 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:01, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flower bed of the hotel New-York at Disneyland resort Paris.jpg

File:Flower bed of the hotel New-York at Disneyland resort Paris.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:04, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Surf

Concerning Category:Surf, Category:Ocean surf and other such categories, please note that this English word "surf" doesn’t have the same narrow meaning as its borrowed cognate in many other languages — for that we do have Category:Surfing. I reverted a couple of your removals of these categories from relevant images, but it is best if you make sure yourself that all the incorrect discategorization is undone and that it is not done futurely. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tuvalkin: OK. I reverted my changes that you did not reverted yet. I added a message in Category:Surf to differentiate from Surfing for no-English (or bad English) language readers :
{{en|1=This category is for waves that break on an ocean shoreline. See "[[:wikt:surf]]". For the sport of riding the surf, please use [[:Category:Surfing]]}} {{fr|1=Cette category est pour les photos de vagues qui éclatent sur une côte océanique. Voir dans le wiktionnaire anglais "[[:wikt:surf]]". Pour le sport de glisse, utiliser SVP [[:Category:Surfing]]}}
But :

What is the difference between Category:Surf (parent category is Category:Water) and Category:Water waves (parent category is Category:Waves) ? I think it should be better to put Category:Water waves as parent of Category:Surf.
What is the difference between Category:Surf and Category:Ocean surf. I think it should be better to merge them. Move all the photos to Category:Ocean surf (parent Category:Water waves) and transform Category:Surf into simple redirect to Category:Ocean surf.

What is your opinion ? --Tangopaso (talk) 16:37, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The message you added is great, and much needed. As for your questions, I share them, and have no good answers (maybe ocean surf excludes surf in lakes or rivers?). I suggest you bring the matter to the Village Pump. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:11, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maquette du chateau du Louvre (est).jpg

File:Maquette du chateau du Louvre (est).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Robert.Allen (talk) 22:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Tangopaso, Please do not take it amiss that I nominated this image for deletion. Your link brought it to my attention, and since I had previously nominated a different image of the same model (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:CastleLouvreModel.jpg), I felt obliged to do the same with yours. Perhaps this time the outcome will be different. --Robert.Allen (talk) 01:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert.Allen: Perhaps you are right, perhaps you are not (I hope). But your proceeding of using my link to put a DR on a photo of mine is unelegant. You should discuss before. --Tangopaso (talk) 10:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you are right. Too late now. My apologies. --Robert.Allen (talk) 22:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 17:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PJ vs Palais de justice

Bonjour,

je fais suite à cette modification https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Nouvelle_police_judiciaire_en_construction_D150721.jpg&diff=168201888&oldid=168064272 et à cet nouvel import File:Nouvelle police judiciaire en construction D150908.jpg.

Le bâtiment photographié est bien le palais de justice et non la police judiciaire. Voir par exemple

Par ailleurs en principe les bâtiments récents ne sont pas admis sur wikimedia Commons (mais je sais pas à partir de quel moment on parle de "bâtiment").

Tiraden (talk) 17:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tiraden: Bonjour Tiraden, et merci pour tes remarques. Je charge cette série de photos avec l'idée de créer une galerie de photos de la construction de ces nouveaux immeubles. En effet, je travaillais à la Défense lors de la construction de la Grande Arche et je ne pardonne pas de ne pas avoir pris des photos de sa construction progressive.

J'étais persuadé que c'était la nouvelle police judiciaire. Mais si tu me confirmes que c'est bien le nouveau palais de justice (comme on le voit sur les photos des sites), je peux demander des renames des photos et de la category. Et rajouter la category que tu avais ajoutée et que j'ai supprimée (donc à tort). Qu'en penses-tu ?

Pour le droit à charger les photos d'immeubles dans Commons, en raison de l'absence de liberté de panorama en France, on ne peut pas charger des photos d'immeuble ou d'oeuvre d'art si l'architecte ou l'artiste n'est pas mort depuis 70 ans au moins (!). Mais il y a des exceptions :

les immeubles en construction (il y en a une tapée dans les category de la Défense)
l'intérieur des immeubles
les immeubles manquant d'originalité (mais le nouveau PJ est original)
les photos où l'immeuble n'est qu'un détail de la photo (ils appellent ça De Minimis)

Ces règles sont désagréables car complexes et donnent lieu à des interprétations et des conflits. Par exemple sur le paragraphe précédent de ma page de discussion. Quand l'immeuble sera terminé, j'essaierai de charger une photo de Minimis. Ou bien, comme l'immeuble semble de structure simple, j'en ferai un schéma sous powerpoint. Sincères salutations. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:35, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Oui j'ai fait des photos aussi de mon côté (mais je ne les ai pas chargé pour le moment). J'en avais fait aussi pour Balard, que j'ai chargé sur Wikipedia francophone, pour les raisons évoquées : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat%C3%A9gorie:Minist%C3%A8re_de_la_D%C3%A9fense_(France)

Je confirme que le bâtiment photographié est bien le palais de justice. A mon avis il n'y a pas besoin de renommer les catégories car on a bien

Category:Palais de Justice de Paris (Batignolles) (le futur, où seront rangées tes trois photos - il y en a déjà d'autres)
Category:Palais de justice de Paris (l'actuel)
Category:Building of direction régionale de la police judiciaire de Paris (Batignolles) (le futur)
Category:36, quai des Orfèvres (l'actuel)
Category:Cité judiciaire de Paris (catégorie chapeau ou pouvant servir si on voir les deux bâtiments sur la même photo)

Tiraden (talk) 11:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tiraden: ok. Je demande rename des images et reclasse dans la catégorie existante. --Tangopaso (talk) 12:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tiraden: Fait. Merci encore pour ta vigilance. --Tangopaso (talk) 13:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

de rien :) Tiraden (talk) 12:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Description line of the rooms of the greek antiquities in the Louvre

@Robert.Allen: @Paris 16: As you do know Louvre museum, I have a question :
I dont understand the description line of the rooms of the greek antiquities. For example in Category:Greek antiquities in the Louvre - Room 12, there is a line : Sully ; Ground floor ; Greek, etruscan and roman antiquities ; Room 12. Vénus de Milo (5). Why Vénus de Milo (5) ? I think that this was an old organization of the rooms of the museum. For example, Venus de Milo was said to be in the room 12 when it is now in room 15. What is your opinion about that ? I do not know enough the museum to make a change myself. But perhaps, I can take a look when I will go there. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are fortunate you can go to check it out. I have to rely on books and the web. These sources say you are correct. Claude Mignot's The Pocket Louvre (published in 2000, on p. 157) has it in Room 12, while the Louvre's Atlas Database, which should be more up-to-date, has it in room 16. --Robert.Allen (talk) 22:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rue Vivienne, 47.jpg

File:Rue Vivienne, 47.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Racconish^☎ 14:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mur le Vau (Louvre).jpg

@Robert.Allen: @Paris 16: While looking to the Antiquities, I took this photo of an (now) internal wall of the Louvre. Special wall by le Vau. Not Philip Augustus, Charles V or Louis XIII walls. It has been rediscovered underground like the medieval Louvre. Incredible ! I had to wait a long time to dont have any visitors on the photo... --Tangopaso (talk) 16:31, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank Tangopaso! And after Robert.Allen and I create all categories of the exterior of the Palais du Louvre, do you can take pictures for each category?--Paris 16 (talk) 16:39, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Paris 16: Je ne vois pas bien les photos que tu voudrais que je prenne. Le mur le Vau était coté sud. Il y a le même coté nord, tout à fait symétrique mais moins important. Je vais surement retourner au Louvre pour faire des photos des antiquités grecques et romaines qui manquent. C'est curieux. Pour les statues célèbres (Vénus de Milo, Victoire de Samothrace), on croule sous les photos. Mais certaines statues moins connues n'ont pas de photos. Il y a aussi dans les catégories Unidentified locations in Louvre, Collections of the Louvre, Files of Louvre with bad file names des photos que l'on peut identifier et catégoriser. --Tangopaso (talk) 21:10, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you Tangopaso! Very nice picture! This wall is described in a couple of books I have on the Grand Louvre project, so I can add some more details to the English description, if that's OK with you. --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:34, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert.Allen: Go ahead. My english is not very fluent, but I try to put always a description in English, because I dont appreciate when I find a photo with a description only in German, Polish or Chinese. You have more information than I, dont hesitate to add details. --Tangopaso (talk) 21:10, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You do a very nice job, which I much appreciate, but I can help make the English more idiomatic for you, too. (I certainly could not do nearly as well in French as you do in English.) --Robert.Allen (talk) 21:24, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I revised and expanded it. I hope the description is not too long, and it is alright by you. You may also notice that I slightly modified your camera position, which didn't seem quite right based on the plans in the two Grand Louvre books. You should probably check the revised co-ordinates to see whether they are reasonable. And, again thanks for making this really nice addition to Commons. --Robert.Allen (talk) 00:07, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert.Allen: Thanks for your adds ! I did not know that the discovery of this ditch disturb the plans of the architecture of the pyramid ! @Paris 16: I think I will go to the Louvre on wednesday. Specially for greek and roman antiquities to notice the names of the rooms. And make additional photos . I will try to make a photo of the wall on the other side for Paris 16. If you have need or request for new photo(s), I will see what I can do. --Tangopaso (talk) 13:47, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, Tangopaso ! Oui, j'ai une demande : le plan du fichier pdf du Louvre montre numéros des salles différents de la base Atlas pour objets d'arts au premier étage de l' aile Sully, côté nord. Par exemple, salle 61 (Cabinets Marie-Antoinette) est situé est à la salle 34 (Charles Boulle) selon Atlas, mais le plan du pdf montre au même emplacement salle 39, et le plan interactif du Louvre montre cette salle est fermée. Est-ce que la base Atlas est au courant? Mille mercis pour cette information :>) --Robert.Allen (talk) 21:54, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert.Allen: Wouaw ! Mais tu parles français aussi bien que moi ! Le plan sur papier distribué dans le musée est identique au .pdf. J'irai voir. J'aimerais bien en savoir un peu plus sur toi si tu es d'accord (âge, études, métier...). Il n'y a pas beaucoup d'info dans ta user page sur english wikipedia en dehors du fait que tu vis dans le District of Columbia. Ce serait peut-être bien que tu la complètes (and its funny to do with the userboxes) --Tangopaso (talk) 10:42, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Robert.Allen: J'ai bien vu la différence entre la base Atlas et le .pdf pour les salles 61,34 et 39. J'irai voir. Mais il est certain que la base Atlas n'est pas à jour. Car ma chère Vénus de Milo est bien dans la salle 16 (coin sud-ouest). Dans la base Atlas, la salle porte le n°7. Les salles des antiquités égyptiennes et near east sont elles identiques. --Tangopaso (talk) 10:53, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused again. According to this page from Atlas, the Venus de Milo is in room 16. Oh, I think I see part of the problem, the Atlas map has room 16 in the wrong place, showing room 16 where the pdf file has room 13. But the description of room 16 pops up when the cursor hovers over the [room under the] Salle des Sept-Cheminées [on first floor] ("room 7" on the Atlas map, "room 16" in the pdf). --Robert.Allen (talk) 07:54, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

News from the Louvre

I went to the Louvre today.

@Paris 16: I uploaded File:Mur le Vau (Louvre) Nord.jpg. As I said, it is absolutely symetric according south side.
@Robert.Allen: The site of the Louvre is OK. The base Atlas is not. The rooms of Marie-Antoinette are 63, 64, 65 in the north-east corner Sully 1st floor. I went for antiquities, but I took however some photos. There are wonderful furniture and cups ! But I will need some times to upload them.

I noticed the names of the antiquities rooms. Those on Commons are old one.
The categorization of Louvre artworks by room is perhaps not a good idea. Because some artworks (not major ones) are changing of rooms sometimes.
I noticed also some descriptions to add them into unidentified photos and to categorize tham.--Tangopaso (talk) 22:06, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see : the Atlas database is very badly out-of-date for the département Objets d'arts on the first floor in the Sully wing north of the Cour Carrée. Maybe the Louvre needs money for a project to make the Atlas database easier to update and correct. --Robert.Allen (talk) 08:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Paris 16: @Robert.Allen: I uploaded :

File:Table à écrire à pupitre de Marie-Antoinette (Louvre, OA 5509).jpg
File:Nécessaire de voyage de Marie-Antoinette (Louvre).jpg
File:Buste de Marie-Antoinette (Louvre, OA 10898).jpg
Category:Decorative arts in the Louvre - Room 63 Cabinet Marie-Antoinette
Category:Decorative arts in the Louvre - Room 64 Galerie Marie-Antoinette
Category:Decorative arts in the Louvre - Room 65 Salle Marie-Antoinette

But I did not take any photo in the room 65. Next time I hope. Best regards.

~~Aargh ! There is a problem with the localization of the rooms. I think they are Sully wing first (or second ?) floor. I dont have maps with me. I will fix it after Christmas.~~ Fixed : Sully wing first floor. --Tangopaso (talk) 21:51, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, Tangopaso! Thanks for taking more photos and at the same sorting out all these location problems. Nice work! --Robert.Allen (talk) 16:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Paris 16: @Robert.Allen: I uploaded :

File:Vue intérieure de la colonnade du Louvre.jpg
File:Escalier Nord-Est de l'aile Sully du Louvre.jpg I dont know if the stairs has a name
File:Salle Marie-Antoinette (Louvre) D151216.jpg my unique photo of the room 65
File:Remainings of the west wall of Louvre medieval.jpg
File:Trace du coin nord ouest et de la tour de la librairie du Louvre medieval.jpg The word "librairie" was used like in English, but now the right French word for "library" is "bibliothèque".

Best regards. --Tangopaso (talk) 21:59, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merci, Tangopaso, for these many new interesting photos! (Sorry for the delay, I've been working on Marot, etc.) --Robert.Allen (talk) 23:39, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Perinaldo - Copie d'une peinture d'Henri Testelin où Colbert présente à Louis XIV les membres de l'académie des Sciences.jpg

File:Perinaldo - Copie d'une peinture d'Henri Testelin où Colbert présente à Louis XIV les membres de l'académie des Sciences.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

95.237.193.31 17:04, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nouvelles du pavillon de l'horloge

@Robert.Allen: @Paris 16: Bonjour. Je suis allé au Louvre voir la nouvelle organisation du pavillon de l'Horloge. Il y a une exposition permanente avec :

Au niveau +2 le Louvre aujourd'hui et demain (bof)
Au niveau +1 l'exposition des oeuvres. Il y a des oeuvres originales et des peintures du musée entre 1795 et 1900
Au niveau -1 une réorganisation du Louvre médiéval. Des petits objets de la vie quotidienne retrouvés lors des fouilles ont été enlevés. Mais d'autres plus grands et plus importants ajoutés. Certains très originaux (biberon, pomme d'arrosoir). Ces objets proviennent aussi de fouilles dans des restes de maison civiles qui étaient construites à l'intérieur du Louvre (dans l'actuelle cour Napoléon) et qui ont été détruites assez tard (au XIX siècle). La reconstitution du casque de Charles VI a été remplacé par les morceaux originaux. Les maquettes montrant le chateau intégré dans la ville remplacées par des vidéos très bien faites. D'autres videos montrent bien le passage du chateau de Philippe Auguste à celui de Charles V. La salle Saint-Louis qui était très obscure est maintenant éclairée et sert de salle d'exposition.

Et surtout on est débarassé des expositions stupides d'art moderne au pied des murailles. Comme la dernière avec 200 chaises en plastique déposées renversées dans tous les sens au pied des murailles.
For Robert.Allen, in my remembering, you do read French language. If not, I apologize and I will make a translation (or at least try to do). --Tangopaso (talk) 09:12, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiloves monuments

Bonjour,
Je vois que nous sommes les deux premiers contributeurs (en terme de date) à Wikiloves monuments France. Merci de charger des photos pour des monuments qui en ont encore très peu. Mais tu charges parfois des couples de photos très semblables comme celui-ci :

02
03

Il me semble qu'il faudrait l'éviter car cela n'apporte pas de plus value d'avoir les deux. Bien sur, beaucoup de contributeurs le font, surtout après la création de l'outil Commonist qui permet de charger des photos en rafale. J'ai parfois essayé de demander la suppression d'une des 2 photos d'un tel couple, mais les admins sont réticents.
Bonnes contributions. --Tangopaso (talk) 07:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Message reçu 5/5. La quarantaine de clichés que j'ai téléchargée ce matin ne participera pas au concours WLM 2016. J'attendrai patiemment le 01/10/2016 pour continuer le travail d'illustration des MH français auquel j'essaye de participer depuis avril 2010. Cdt.--GO69 (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Tangopaso (et GO69),

Si sur le fond, je ne désapprouve pas vraiment ton message (encore que, sur Commons, on a pas de problème de place et deux images d’apparence identique peuvent avoir des détails différents ; c'est pourquoi on ne supprime généralement pas ce genre de paire de photos), sur la forme je trouve ton message malvenu et décourageant, chacun est bénévole et participe (tant à Commons qu'à Wiki Loves Monuments) selon ses envies, ses besoins et ses capacités dans le respect des règles (notamment de savoir-vivre).

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:42, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PS: pour information, le tout premier participant chronologiquement à WLM 2016 pour la France est Pymouss

.

Bonjour Tangopaso, tu viens encore de froisser un susceptible... Impossible de faire autrement, par définition ! Amitiés, --Edelseider (talk) 09:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MaDeNo 2016

[9]. Bien à toi, --Edelseider (talk) 19:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Waves categories

Hi, Tangopaso. I want to let you know that I recategorized Category:Waves by country and its subcategories. I did this because waves can be in any body of water, not just oceans or seas, and they aren't necessarily at a coast. For example, there can be waves in lakes, and also in the middle of a body of water away from the coast or shore. If you want these categories to be specifically for waves at coastlines, you could move them to different names with the term "coastal waves" or something similar. If you have any questions, feel free to let me know. --Auntof6 (talk) 18:08, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 23:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Lake of Disney Village 2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 23:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Flower bed of the hotel New-York at Disneyland resort Paris.jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 23:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alsace

Bonjour Tangopaso et merci de ton message. J'ai passé quelques jours en Alsace moi aussi et j'en ai profité pour prendre un certain nombre de photos à Strasbourg mais aussi à Colmar et Haguenau. A Strasbourg, effectivement, on fouillait les sacs à l'entrée du marché de Noël, à Colmar également. A Haguenau, par contre, aucune fouille et aucun gendarme. Pas de touristes asiatiques non plus comme à Colmar, où ils étaient légion, mais beaucoup d'Allemands. Bref, le marché de Haguenau baigne encore dans une ambiance surannée d'avant la mondialisation et le terrorisme - pourtant, la ville est devenue assez dynamique, avec beaucoup de gros chantiers. En tout cas, je suis impatient de voir tes photos ! Amitiés, --Edelseider (talk) 09:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Multiple house numbers

Hi Tangopaso, what is the category Category:Multiple house numbers intended for? For numbers of more houses placed together, or for a dual numbering system? --ŠJů (talk) 17:37, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ŠJů: Hello. I created this category for the houses which have more than one house number. For example, because the numbering of the houses has been changed. In the US, the house number is often the distance in meters from the beginning of the street. In France, the houses are numbered 1, 3, 5... on a side of the street and 2, 4, 6... on the other side. So if there is a very large building at number 4, if this building is destroyed and 3 houses built at this place, the houses will be numbered 2, 2bis and 2ter.

And sometimes (a century later) it is necessary to renumber all the buildings of the street. Sometimes the old numbering is preserved for some years or some decades.

We have another amusing change in France : when the name of the streets changes. For example during a revolution, or in reverse after a defeated revolution. That is why I created Category:Double street signs. I like this photo : File:Bordeaux-quartierstPierre-P1080465.jpg : the street had 3 names : royal street, liberty street, street with the name of a man.

We are perhaps a little bit complicated... Best regards. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regrettably, the category mixes together all types of cases when more number signs appear together. In some countries of the former Austria-Hungary, double system of numbering (conscription/orientation number) is a standard in towns and cities. Possible renumbering is a different case. Moreover, one house (with one conscription number) can have more entries or sides and every entry or side of the house can have a separate orientation number. And an other different case is when more houses have a common entry gate or entry portal (see this one or this one). An other case are direction/section street signs which present a number scope or number list for the corresponding direction. Shouldn't be these cases more differentiated in categorization?

As regards Category:Double street signs, the category also mixes more cases: "old and new name", "guideposts to two diferent streets", "multilingual street signs" etc. . --ŠJů (talk) 19:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ŠJů: For me, it is too complex. In Category:Double street signs, I added a warning message. I dont know the habits in former Austria-Hungary and my English language speaking is not very fluent. Feel free to add subcategories necessary according to your opinion. Or to reorganize them. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Where did you hear that US house numbers indicate the number of meters from the end of a street? I've never heard of that, and I don't think that's the case. For one thing, the US doesn't use the metric system, so any such convention wouldn't be based on meters. There are many very short streets where the building numbers are all four digits long. In many cases in the US, building numbers (whether for houses or anything else) start with a convenient number at the end of the street and go up by two for each building. Even numbers are on one side of the street and odd numbers are on the other. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:00, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Bien mérité ! Chapeau, l'artiste ! Edelseider (talk) 15:39, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Edelseider: Merci beaucoup, mais c'est toujours un plaisir de photographier une aussi belle ville !--Tangopaso (talk) 15:46, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Du nouveau au Sofitel de Strasbourg

Bonjour Tangopaso, je suis sûr que cette information va te faire plaisir : construction d'une aubette. Amitiés, --Edelseider (talk) 14:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Edelseider: Bonjour ! Merci pour l'info. Cette année, on était à l'hotel Mercure tout à coté. La 1ere année, on est allé à ce Sofitel, mais c'est très cher. Mais on n'a pas regretté, car les chambres étaient super et le petit déjeuner pantagruélique. C'est rigolo, car quand je suis venu à Strasbourg la 1ere fois, je n'avais pas entendu le terme d'aubette depuis 30 ans, depuis mon service militaire dans la marine où c'était le terme usuel pour désigner le poste de garde. Amitiés. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:46, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Plants_in_the_United_States

Plants in the United States has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 18:13, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Names of green spaces in Paris

Hi Tangopaso!

Do you know the rule to name the green spaces in Paris? I have a list here but i'm very confused:

Jardin de la Butte Bergeyre or Jardin de la Butte-Bergeyre
Jardin de l'îlot Riquet or Jardin de l'îlot-Riquet
Jardin de la Porte de Saint-Cloud or Jardin de la porte de Saint-Cloud or Jardin de la Porte-de-Saint-Cloud

Thank you!--Paris 16 (talk) 11:28, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Paris 16: Hello. Je me permets de te répondre en français car je crois que c'est ta langue maternelle ou équivalent. Je ne connais pas les normes des noms de parcs ou de voies. Je vois que souvent ces noms changent (pour ajouter des - par exemple) et il s'ensuit des move ou des rename. J'avoue que je suis (bêtement) le flux en m'efforçant de respecter les règles que je crois avoir compris :

Toutes les noms de category de rues sur Commons doivent être suffixés par (Paris). Pour moi c'est une bonne chose car il y a quand même de nombreux homonymes entre villes. Et suffixer systématiquement évite de se poser des questions. Mais je pense que 99,5% des noms de voies ont déjà été créés.
Les mots des noms de voies, parcs... doivent être séparés par un - et pas par un espace. Exemple : Category:Place de la Porte-de-Saint-Cloud (Paris). J'y vois pas clair sur l'usage des majuscules, mais j'aurais tendance à privilégier Jardin de la Porte-de-Saint-Cloud.

Amitiés. --Tangopaso (talk) 17:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Relations (stencil).jpg

File:Relations (stencil).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:55, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Graffiti on the basement of the blockhaus 1 in Capbreton.jpg

File:Graffiti on the basement of the blockhaus 1 in Capbreton.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sequoias in EuroDisney, some years later.jpg

File:Sequoias in EuroDisney, some years later.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Elisfkc (talk) 16:12, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uso un traductor en línea

Saludos Tangopaso, disculpe que le hable en español. Yo no hablo idiomas y utilizo el traductor en línea del diario El País [10]. No entiendo por qué ha borrado mi edición, ni entiendo la razón que ha dado, lo siento. Si es un problema de traducción automática ¿no sería mejor que usted, que sí conoce idiomas mejore la redacción? El problema principal de la incompleta y tendenciosa definición que había en inglés y francés era precisamente eso: que era incompleta y que adjudicaba el uso del término venta aplicado a un establecimiento casi en exclusiva al País Vasco. Tengo casa allí y sé qué es una Benta/Venta/Vente. Y llevo varios días documentando y ampliando el artículo en español sobre las ventas como establecimientos, desde el siglo XV, en España. Estoy seguro de que debe de haber alguna confusión. Le ruego que reconsidere su edición. Gracias.--Latemplanza (talk) 18:31, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Latemplanza: Hello, I apologize, but I am French and I speak only English. About Category:Ventas :

I created short descriptions (2 lines) in English and French. And it is enough for a category in Commons. For more informations, wikipedians have to look at the pages in wikipedia's. There is a blue link on the left to the wikipedia's in French, Spanish and Euskara. (No page in English). It is unuseful to add a description with several lines. These details have to be added into wikipedia's, not into Commons.
I added a short description in Spanish, you can fix it.
I visited also some ventas (in France) : la Rhune, Ispeguy, Ibardin. I added some photos.

Best regards. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:18, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lo siento, Tangopaso. Parece que no me entiende o no quiere entenderme. Sus sucintas definiciones inducen a una conclusión errónea. Las ventas (término en castellano que no sé si tiene validez en el protocolo de Commons) no son establecimientos de 'restauración'; en el siglo XIV (vea descripciones en El Libro del Buen Amor (ca. 1330) o El Quijote (1615), o en pinturas como es:La riña en la Venta Nueva de es:Francisco de Goya) no se había inventado el término restauración. Como edificio, específico modelo o ejemplo de arquitectura popular común a toda España, está representado en toda la Península Ibérica y Canarias, y con ese título también en México desde, al menos así documentado, el siglo XIX.

Las ventas que en el siglo XXI llevan en Euskadi ese título son una mezcla de supermercado, casa de comidas o comedor popular, y en ocasiones, albergue u hostal, y quedan nombradas en tres idiomas, lo que todavía resta más interés a enunciarlas en una definición de dos líneas, en la categoría general de las ventas en Commons, salvo que se creara una subcategoría para ventas del País Vasco. Puede hacerlo, crear esa subcategoría y llevar a ella los archivos relacionados, como los de la categoría creada para las ventas de la Rhune (con solo 5 archivos), y poner allí su, al parecer intocable definición. Intocable pero errónea y muy parcial o localista, en el contexto de una definición general de venta. Si de verdad tiene usted interés por saber qué es un venta, puede leer el relato de Gustavo Adolfo Bécquer La Venta de los Gatos, o el poema de Machado dedicado a Azorín, describiendo la Venta de Cidones [11]. Estoy hablándole de ventas de verdad, con muchos siglos de historia, aunque sin iconografía lamentablemente, y ninguna de ellas estuvo en el País Vasco.

Un saludo.--Latemplanza (talk) 07:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Latemplanza: I have some problems to translate your message in English or French with Google... It is unclear. For me, Category:Ventas is OK with what I know and what I saw. You can create Category:Ventas (Spain) or Category:Ventas (historical) to fit to what you say. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:07, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tangopaso and @Latemplanza: I think you are both right in a way. Tangopaso, the right place for an extensive information are Wikipedias, but since Commons is a multi-cultural project and some wikipedias lack of the correspondent articles, categories should have not only a concise description but also informative enough for editors (or external readers) from any country can understand what the images are about. I agree that long and/or too local descriptions are not appropriate in a general category, so I have rewritten the information in Spanish and English (sorry but my French is not good enough to write a proper version) to give a generic idea of what a venta is. Also I have created two sub-categories where you can add the specific information about those countries. I hope this solves discrepancies and feel free to modify what you consider neccessary. Greetings. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Translation/traducción

Hola tangopaso y Latemplanza, creo que ambos tienen razón. Tangopaso, el lugar adecuado para dar una información extensa son las wikipedias, pero ya que Commons es un proyecto multi-cultural y algunas wikipedias carecen de los artículos correspondientes, las categorías deberían tener una información no solo concisa, sino también suficientemente informativa como para que editores (o lectores externos) de cualquier país puedan entender de qué tratan las imágenes. Estoy de acuerdo en que largas y/o descripciones demasiado locales no son apropiadas en una categoría general, por lo que he reescrito la información en español e inglés (lo siento pero mi francés no es bueno para escribir una versión correcta) para dar una idea general de lo que es una venta. También he creado dos sub-categorías, donde se puede añadir la información específica de esos países. Espero que esto resuelva las discrepancias, y modificad mi escrito como consideréis oportuno. Saludos. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:42, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For me its ok, I improved the fr description. --Tangopaso (talk) 13:54, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Cookie: Mucho mejor, gracias.--Latemplanza (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad then. Thank you for your understanding :-) Cheers. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:12, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Milk

Hi. Don't forget the beautiful water buffaloes please. In my childhood I loved to look at them lying lazy in muddy waters... --E4024 (talk) 13:44, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. ??? Water buffaloes ???? I dont understand, sorry, but I am French. About why photo ? I try to clean some categories. If you dont agree, you may revert. --Tangopaso (talk) 13:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revert? What? I'm all French to reverting good edits. I just wanted to say merci for the Category:Cheese by milk that you opened. The water buffaloes have a hi-fat milk with which wonderful cheese, yogurt and kaymak is made. Cheers. --E4024 (talk) 14:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: Sorry, I didnt understand. In French, water Buffalo milk doesnt mean anything. In France, there is no water in milk nor cheese (happilly). I linked Category:Water buffalo milk products to Category:Cheese by milk I created. --Tangopaso (talk) 14:12, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, all the mammals drink water. This is why their milk is liquid (has water in it :). The water buffaloes also lie in mud and water ponds, like pigs. --E4024 (talk) 14:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: Yes, but in France, this is a sensitive subject because during the wars (and specially German occupation in WWII) some peasants added water to milk to make money. No water in milk nor cheese, but yogourt its different. --Tangopaso (talk) 14:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright, Tangopaso, I'm only trying to tell you that "water buffalo" is an animal who likes water; you opened the "milk with water" issue... :-) --E4024 (talk) 14:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

En français pour essayer d'être plus clair Water Buffalo (note le W en majuscule) c'est le nom anglais du « buffle domestique », rien à voir avec l'eau (enfin très indirectement, un peu comme pour la poule d'eau). Le message d'origine était la pour te signaler l'oubli des fromages de buffles (dont fait pourtant partie la célèbre mozzarella). Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 15:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Baseless localization?

Hi Tangopaso. Where did you take the idea that this photo should be from the Czech Republic? I can see no localization in the file description and in file metadata. Even the uploader has nothing to do with Czechia. --ŠJů (talk) 21:18, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming files

Hi Tangopaso,

here on Commons you are filemover. So you can move files yourself and have no need for such request. Do it yourself please. Thanks ×hlrmnτ 21:49, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How it works in French ×hlrmnτ 21:52, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thymus seedling D170813.jpg

Hi! Can you tell me if it was Thymus vulgaris or other Thymus species? Regards, Salicyna (talk) 09:46, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Salicyna: Hello. I think it is Thymus vulgaris because I took it from the garden of my mother-in-law in Burgundy. See for example File:Thymus vulgaris in garden 2.jpg. And I know that the thyme in this garden comes from Provence in the wild. In Burgundy, it grows in a soil with clay. I to grow it on a balcony in a suburb near Paris. --Tangopaso (talk) 16:33, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I want to use it in my Flora of Poland seedling identification guide that I started on Polish Wikibooks, I am very thankful for any photos of seedlings (or young plants). :) Salicyna (talk) 16:56, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Young seedling of ivy.jpg

Hi! Are you sure it's Hedera helix? Salicyna (talk) 07:12, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Salicyna: Not sure. I suppose, but perhaps I am wrong. And I cannot check, because I destroyed them. It was curious to have ivy seed brought by birds (I have also robinia like that). But I do not want grow ivy. Best regards. --Tangopaso (talk) 14:30, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm almost sure it's not Hedera helix, but I don't know what it is - maybe Parthenocissus? Salicyna (talk) 15:05, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User categories

If you don't want a category to be a user category, then give it a name that describes the visual contents of the images, and which is consistent with commons naming structure, rather than attaching your user name. - Themightyquill (talk) 10:39, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Boletus? images

Dear Tangopaso, I moved to the category "Unidentified fungi in France" 3 of your images, categorised as "Boletus edulis in France". As it is evident from one of them, there is a distinct ring on the stem which never occurs in boleti. It reminds me kind of a slippery jack, but I am not sure. Please take a better look at those images. All the best, Mykola Swarnyk (talk) 23:19, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Diane de Poitiers visitant l'atelier de Jean Goujon (Louvre, RF 1997-38).jpg

hi, nice upload. i would suggest for artworks, you use template:artwork, which you can upload with commons:pattypan, or old uploader [12] -- cheers. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 13:32, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. But when I upload a photo, I dont have enough informations to use template:artwork. For example, I dont have the dimensions of the painting, nor the references on the databases Atlas or Joconde. I have only the Louvre number. --Tangopaso (talk) 20:16, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Small shop on a half moon of the pont Neuf.jpg

File:Small shop on a half moon of the pont Neuf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

HotaniKG (talk) 05:27, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

rollback

Hi. Sorry about what just happened. it was my mistake. Sincerely Ahmad^talk 06:13, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tangopaso,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8309 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Tangopaso,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Antonov AN-70 at Paris Air Show 2013 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nike (Louvre, MI 34).jpg

Hi, Tangopaso noticing this upload, I was wondering: Joseph Vattier de Bourville died November 1, 1954, so he can hardly have purchased this item. Would you take a look at the description? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 06:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. De Bourville died in 1854, not 1954 (born in 1812). This information comes from the Louvre museum. Perhaps, the statue was bought in 1855 from the heirs of de Bourville. --Tangopaso (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plaque d'immatriculation à flouter

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/33/Rue_Armand_Carrel%2C_28_%28Montreuil%29.jpg

Bonsoir, il y a une plaque d'immatriculation visible depuis l'image

Cordialement, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klaeiis (talk • contribs) 00:13, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 1.jpg

And also:

File:Strikes at the Louvre Pyramid 2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Minorax^talk _{(formerly 大诺史)} 15:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Anti-LGBT_logos

Anti-LGBT logos has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

80.229.137.112 21:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Central plaza by night.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, (Oinkers42) (talk) 04:56, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Advertising poster for the exhibition The Birth of Modern Greece in Louvre museum (2021-2022).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Advertising poster for the exhibition The Birth of Modern Greece in Louvre museum (2021-2022).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 08:10, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1843 en P-A et Nouvelle-Aquitaine

Bonjour, pourrais-tu me donner les raisons de ton revert que tu n'as pas pris le temps d'expliquer ? Merci. --Birdie (talk) 07:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour. Quel est l'intérêt de passer d'une category existante Category:1843 in Nouvelle-Aquitaine à une category qui n'existe pas Category:1843 in Pyrénées-Atlantiques? --Tangopaso (talk) 08:37, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rename of file?

Hello Tangopaso, looking to this file (and the other one), wondering if the file should be renamed and the louvre addition removed from it's description . Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 05:08, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: Hello. Good idea. Perhaps rename the file Centre_Georges_Pompidou_1971_Fortepan_87512.jpg. Because the painting is not in the Louvre but in the Centre Georges Pompidou in Paris. It is a museum of modern art, there is not modern art in the Louvre. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tangppaso, Looking closely to the file, if you ask me, this is an exhibition of Picasso paintings at the Louvre. So a rename like this would not be a good idea. Since I was not there, and I did not take the photo, there is little I can do. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 04:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: In my opinion, there was never Picasso exhibition in Louvre museum. There is not modern art in the Louvre. Dont mind. Keep the current file name. --Tangopaso (talk) 21:09, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tangopasso, it could have been a temoprary exhibition, to do with the opening of the Centre Pompidou (completed in 1971). If you ask me, this is an interior of a historical building. Might be worht digging further in to this.

Lotje (talk) 04:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

... and I did: ...https://www.lemonde.fr/m-le-mag/article/2021/10/12/picasso-au-louvre-en-1971-derriere-l-hommage-l-operation-seduction_6097969_4500055.html

Lotje (talk) 04:28, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.ina.fr/ina-eclaire-actu/video/caf89033275/picasso-au-louvre in the Category:Grande Galerie (Louvre room), so that is where I will add the images (for the time being). Lotje (talk) 04:39, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: OK. I did not know that. You can update the file as you want. --Tangopaso (talk) 16:49, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No need to do that anymore I guess, adding it to the correct category and changing the description should imo be enough. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 16:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: OK. I do. --Tangopaso (talk) 18:55, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: I saw that you made some updates. OK. I add some others. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:AFP (Paris).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:25, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Un chaton pour toi !

Merci pour toutes ces images à renommer/identifier pour le Louvre :-) (gro-meuleu-meuleu moi qui pensait avoir presque terminée de ranger cette catégorie)

Miniwark (talk) 10:42, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Miniwark: Merci bien, surtout que j'adore les chats. J'en ai un. J'adore aussi le Louvre et je m'occupe en reclassant des photos ou en en faisant de nouvelles. J'ai un badge permanent d'accès pour 2 personnes. Si tu passes par Paris, fais moi signe, on pourra aller y faire un tour. --Tangopaso (talk) 17:22, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tangopaso: Ok, je le note, ce n'est pas tombé dans l'oreille d'un sourd :-) Miniwark (talk) 10:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Your waiting time (to enter into Louvre museum) is calculated at 1hour 30.jpg

File:Your waiting time (to enter into Louvre museum) is calculated at 1hour 30.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Lukas Beck (talk) 09:54, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Escalier d'honneur du conseil constitutionnel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:04, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cock as symbol of the French Republique

Bonjour Tangopaso. Tu as créé en 2010 la Category:Cock as symbol of the French Republique. Il n'y aurait pas une erreur dans le libellé ? Je croyais qu'en anglais la République française se traduisait par French Republic. Père Igor (talk) 09:52, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Père Igor: Bonjour, père Igor. Tu as tout à fait raison. En 2010, je ne faisais du wikipedia que depuis 2 ans. Par ailleurs en anglais, un coq se dit rooster et pas cock. J'ai appris ça expliquant la vie de Saint Pierre aux touristes US devant l'église Saint-Pierre de Montmartre. C'est comme ca aussi que j'ai appris que les coqs au sommet des clochers des églises rappellent la trahison de Pierre. Je te laisse modifier si tu le souhaites. --Tangopaso (talk) 21:12, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Si c'est possible, je préfèrerais que tu t'en charges. Cordialement. Père Igor (talk) 14:08, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

C'est fait : Category:Cock as symbol of the French Republic. Père Igor (talk) 17:45, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Passage du Gorch Fock sous le pont d'Aquitaine de Bordeaux (D1967-05-06).jpg

And also:

File:Pilier du pont d'Aquitaine.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Japanese garden Monaco (stone lantern).jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:13, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Temporary exhibition about WWI, gare de Paris-Est, 2014 (caltrops).jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Tangopaso

Tip: Categorizing images

Sculpture de Henri Lombard

Paname (suite)

Vol d'image

Géolocalisation, etc.

Paname encore et toujours

TUSC token 919a2ce37c6f0dc88df6f894a3c87373

A barnstar for you!

On the display of highlighted (FP/QI/VI) media in Commons main category structure

Paname-sur-Seine

how can something with an exact geolocation be an unidentified location

Senecio erucifolius vs. Jacobaea erucifolia

Please undo your edits

Suppression de la catégorie Interior of Notre-Dame de Paris

Galleries in category space

Badly thought out categories

Exposition gare de l'est de paris

Images du Louvre

Photo de Chelles

Caryatids in Paris

Category-based galleries

Surf

Notification about possible deletion

PJ vs Palais de justice

Description line of the rooms of the greek antiquities in the Louvre

News from the Louvre

Nouvelles du pavillon de l'horloge

Wikiloves monuments

MaDeNo 2016

Waves categories

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Alsace

A barnstar for you!

Du nouveau au Sofitel de Strasbourg

Names of green spaces in Paris

Uso un traductor en línea

Milk

Baseless localization?

Renaming files

User categories

Boletus? images

rollback

Community Insights Survey

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Important message for file movers

Quality Image Promotion

Plaque d'immatriculation à flouter

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

File tagging File:Advertising poster for the exhibition The Birth of Modern Greece in Louvre museum (2021-2022).jpg

1843 en P-A et Nouvelle-Aquitaine

Rename of file?

Notification about possible deletion

Un chaton pour toi !

Quality Image Promotion

Category:Cock as symbol of the French Republique

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

Search