User talk:Yann

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

/archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

God is busy, may I help you? / Dieu est occupé, puis-je vous aider?

You can leave me a message in English or French, at the bottom. Click here. Yann 22:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)

About File:Tarjeton Electoral de Venezuela 2024.jpg

Dear Yann, this image was published by the Venezuelan government and according to the legislation and laws of the country, the image is in the public domain due to the official use that is given to it by entering Pd-Venezuela, in fact the template that had Wilfredor (talk) 13:48, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 19:36, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Yann Wilfredor (talk) 20:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Juste PVI, putting that image in the right article resulted in global block of Wikipedia au Venezuela. Merci encore [1] Wilfredor (talk) 23:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Wilfredor: How sad and silly! If it was published by the Venezuelan government, why do they care about its publication on WP? Is the WMF informed about this? I know the WMF likes to document and respond to censorship events. Best, Yann (talk) 07:38, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, WMF is aware of this. It's not just Wikipedia, they have blocked many pages that show any negative content about the government. Thank you for your concern. Wilfredor (talk) 21:36, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming of copyvio graphic war image (NSFW)

What do you suggest we do? Trade (talk) 14:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trade: Could you be a bit more explicit? Yann (talk) 12:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Image Under Deletion Request Appeal

You deleted File:TEXRail Map.jpg which was initially tagged for speedy deletion by a user, but they incorrectly attributed the source of the image which they claimed was where the copyright violation was from. This was incorrect and I filed an appeal here per the instructions on the speedy deletion template.

I can be corrected, but an image shouldn't be deleted while it's in the hands of the community so to speak, where they're input is being asked for, especially since the logic of the user that initially reported the image for speedy deletion was offbase.

Baseball Watcher (talk) 12:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Baseball Watcher: Hi, If you want to contest the deletion, you should do it here. Yann (talk) 20:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File to be deleted

Hello Yann,

Can you please delete the file "File:Namibia LGBT+ Flag.png" I uploaded in June, it was brought to my attention that the design is in fact copyrighted under Namibian law. Evidence can be found here at the creator's twitter account. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 17:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cdjp1: Please create a deletion request. Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah that's where it is, apologies. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 20:55, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CCC Cover

Hello. I understand why the CCC cover was deleted but I am wondering if you could help me figure our how to add a cover of the journal. I have seen other Wikipedia articles (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_English) covering academic journals use a fair use rationalization. thank you for any explanation or help! Matthewvetter (talk) Matthewvetter (talk) 19:12, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Matthewvetter: Hi, Please read en:WP:FU. For questions regarding English Wikipedia, please ask there. Yann (talk) 20:44, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Portrait of Augusta and Jacqueline Dejerine-Klumpke, Wellcome L0003543.jpg

Bonjour, vous avez renommé la page "Portrait of Augusta and Jacqueline" en "Portrait of Augusta and Yvonne", mais Augusta avait une petite-fille prénommée Jacqueline (voir https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augusta_Dejerine-Klumpke), donc le 1e titre est plausible, et il correspond à la description d'origine de l'image. Il me semble qu'il faudrait revenir en arrière, mais apparemment je ne peux pas annuler votre modif... Madamedekeravel (talk) 08:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done OK. Yann (talk) 19:51, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion closure

I'm reaching out based on the instructions at Commons:Deletion_policy#Appeal. This deletion closure does not seem to make sense:[2] It ignores the issue raised in the first comment. There's no evidence that the person uploading the video had the rights to it, Rjjiii (talk) 03:20, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

権利をもっている画像が削除されました

権利を持っている画像を削除されました。 また私のI'dが使えなくなると言われております。早急に確認改善お願いします。 あきニャン (talk) 05:02, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caftan

Hi This account to look like to him. Also, you have deleted file from Pinterest uploaded by Littlexiaogui.

I don't know if the file from museum are free. Panam2014 (talk) 14:16, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the painting is fine. Yann (talk) 14:23, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And this? Panam2014 (talk) 14:40, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why should it an issue? Yann (talk) 14:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There have already been deleted files that were taken from a glass gallery and were not the author's. It seems to me that they were published by Littlexiaogui. So I ask for a checking. Panam2014 (talk) 14:47, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Here, I don't see hint that it is not a picture taken by the uploader: high resolution, EXIF data, etc. The item seems old, and is most probably in the public domain. Yann (talk) 14:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

hinnk (talk) 21:11, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

DR

The image isn't actually a copyright violation, I'm sorry for having opened that DR. FlightGear is a free, open source game. If you think it's out of scope (and I'd agree), please opean a new DR. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:15, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, wait, you haven't deleted it. I just moved it without leaving a redirect :P nevermind... RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paolo Conte

Je ne comprends pas pourquoi la plus grande partie des images de l'article français sur Paolo Conte ont été supprimées pour violation des droits d'auteur, alors que ces mêmes images figurent dans l'article italien, labellisé article de qualité (l'article français est pour l'essentiel une traduction de l'article italien). Perri.G (talk) 08:09, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Perri.G: Bonjour, J'ai restauré 2 des images, mais à mon avis, elles ont besoin d'une autorisation. Yann (talk) 09:33, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tarjeton Electoral de Venezuela 2024.jpg

@Yann:Hello, this photo should be removed or keep?? (Google translator) AbchyZa22 (talk) 22:58, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads by User talk:Mxhicheck

Hello, thanks for handling the ones I tagged from this user that were violations. I stopped tagging because as I was going through their contributions it seems like all of their image uploads are taken from the website of icheck. But their username suggests that they may be affiliated with icheck, and as such perhaps they do have the ability to release them into the public domain/under a compatible license. I didn't want to keep tagging as copyright violations, but at the same time I'm not sure if tagging as permission required for delayed deletion would be appropriate either. Another factor that led me to stop tagging is my likely inability to communicate with the user if they truly are a representative of the company - the company is Vietnamese and it's likely they only speak that language. I know there's a lot of templates that could be used to give them information about how to submit proof they are legally allowed to release the images to Commons.. but I'm not sure what the best way forward would've been to both flag the issue with the others and give the user the information to correct it if they do have that permission - to tag for speedy as copyvio, to tag for delayed as permission required, or to leave the user some template note (and if so which one) regarding the issue? Berchanhimez (talk) 23:55, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the deletion of Userːbirkho and Talk:Userːbirkho

Thanks for deleting Userːbirkho, but I had expected that the Talk page also would be deleted. I moved the content to the true User_talk:Birkho#About_the_status_of_Talk:Userːbirkho, which I mentioned in the Speedy deletion request. Should I create a seperate Speedy deletion request for Talk:Userːbirkho? JopkeB (talk) 04:30, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Ah yes, I didn't see this page. Yann (talk) 08:48, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! JopkeB (talk) 09:17, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files by Onyidzan

Hello!

You deleted File:Logo SMA Negeri 2 Kediri.png and File:Logo Smada Kediri.png as copyvios, however they have now been reuploaded, the former under the same name and the latter as File:MTsN 2 Kediri.jpg. I guess they should be deleted again? But I'm not sure about their copyright status in Indonesia, as well as the US. Leaving it up to you if you don't mind. Jonteemil (talk) 17:59, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Files deleted, and account blocked indef. for Flickr license washing. Yann (talk) 19:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can the Talk page of File:Куклы Ленина и Сталина.png also be deleted?

Thanks voor deleting File:Куклы Ленина и Сталина.png. Can File talk:Куклы Ленина и Сталина.png also be deleted? JopkeB (talk) 04:40, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Yann (talk) 08:16, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! JopkeB (talk) 11:23, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvios?

Hi Yann. Can you take a look at File:Screenshot from 2024-08-05 20-48-45.png, File:Angel Glady.jpg and File:Angel Glady.png? These file were uploaded shortly after you just deleted File:Angel.Theatre.jpg, File:Negha.jpg and File:Glady.jpg as copyvios, and I'm wondering whether they should at least require VRT verification. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:10, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already deleted. Yann (talk) 07:58, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Re: DR

Hello, the image is the user's own photograph and in accordance with established policy, it must be deleted. Beto·CG 08:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your rationale is wrong, but I deleted it for abuse of COM:WEBHOST. Yann (talk) 08:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Beto·CG 08:32, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Damage from the 1968 Charles City tornado just south of the Cedar River looking north.jpg

Sending this to any uninvolved administrator I can find. The above deletion discussion as seen on the administrators noticeboard; an involved admin (J. Mabel) is urging someone to close the discussion one way or the other. If it’s already closed, don’t do anything. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 19:38, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests

You send me a message with: "You must inform the uploader when you tag a file for deletion.".

I thought that writing a "speedy deletion" (for example: {{Speedy deletion|[[Commons:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion|G10. Files and pages created as advertisements]]}}; now for a new file to delete (File:Image of her machine Pakistan our.jpg)), it was enough, and a message was sent to the uploader, automatically. Is there a standard type of message to send to uploader?.

Thank you! Jmarchn (talk) 04:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmarchn: Hi, This is certainly in scope for Commons (not an advertisement), but may be a derivative work, so it is not eligible for speedy deletion. So please create a regular deletion request. Yann (talk) 15:19, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sir Arne's Treasure (1919) by Mauritz Stiller.webm

File:Sir Arne's Treasure (1919) by Mauritz Stiller.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

hinnk (talk) 18:33, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Flame of Life (1919) by Mauritz Stiller.webm

File:The Flame of Life (1919) by Mauritz Stiller.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

hinnk (talk) 18:37, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ravi Shankar.jpg

Restorable? ★ 19:10, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is FP anyway: not very big, poor composition, etc. Yann (talk) 19:52, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

hinnk (talk) 00:52, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Caftan

Hi

Now, we have three new copyvio : [3], [4], [5]

Copyvio have been already deleted : [6]. Panam2014 (talk) 10:54, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Algol, Tragödie der Macht (1920) by Hans Werckmeister.webm

File:Algol, Tragödie der Macht (1920) by Hans Werckmeister.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

hinnk (talk) 08:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Algol 1920.jpg

File:Algol 1920.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

hinnk (talk) 08:10, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:2027 WC Fanmade Logo.png

Hi Yann. You deleted File:2027 WC Fanmade Logo.png as a copyvio, but it seems (at least according to this discussion on English Wikipedia) to have been reuploaded and cropped as File:2027 CWC Fanmade Logo.png. Whether the reuploaded and cropped version is OK for Commons (maybe the text-only revision is), I'll leave up to your discretion; however, even the text-only version might be considered a problem per c:COM:EDUSE since it appears to come from fanart that has pretty much no encyclopedic value. It would be hard to justify the use of any fanart logo (even a Pd-logo one) in any language Wikipedia article about any major international sporting event in lieu of the main official logo of such an event, even if that main official logo has yet to have been released. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:35, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Hi,
I don't know if File:2027 CWC Fanmade Logo.png is in scope, but it is OK copyright wise. The deleted logo included a complex design. Yann (talk) 10:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The file appears to have been overwritten, and I'm not sure if the older version might be the same as the one you deleted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 10:47, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Marchjuly: Yes, they are the same. Yann (talk) 10:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Do you think the re-upload needs to be split? -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have hidden the old file. Yann (talk) 11:32, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking a look at this. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yann&oldid=908746448"